Topic Details (Notes format)

Concurrent Powers and Doctrine of Repugnancy

Subject: Polity

Book: Indian Polity by M. Laxmikanth

When Parliament and a state legislature pass conflicting laws on concurrent list subjects, central law prevails (Article 254) unless the state law obtains presidential assent. This “doctrine of repugnancy” prevents overlapping statutes from causing confusion. Courts analyze whether an actual conflict exists or if both laws can coexist. If repugnancy is found, the union law or the latter law with presidential assent supersedes. This ensures legislative harmony and respects the Constitution’s hierarchy. States, though free to adapt central frameworks for local conditions, must avoid direct contradiction. Mastery of this principle explains how India’s concurrency fosters unity without stifling state innovation.

Practice Questions

अभियोजक की नियुक्ति किस प्रावधान के तहत होती है?

Who has the authority to remove the Vice President of India from office?

न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति में किस समिति की सिफारिश ली जाती है?

भारतीय संसद में सर्वोच्च विधायी प्राधिकारी कौन है?

संघीय ढांचे का विवरण किस अनुच्छेद में मिलता है?

Which is the largest state in India by area?

संसद सदस्यों का वेतन का निर्धारण किसकी स्वीकृति से होता है?

Which of the following is the longest-serving political party in India?

Which article of the Indian Constitution mentions the procedure for amendment?

किस संविधान संशोधन ने निर्वाचन प्रणाली में सुधार किया?