Topic Details (Notes format)

Concurrent Powers and Doctrine of Repugnancy

Subject: Polity

Book: Indian Polity by M. Laxmikanth

When Parliament and a state legislature pass conflicting laws on concurrent list subjects, central law prevails (Article 254) unless the state law obtains presidential assent. This “doctrine of repugnancy” prevents overlapping statutes from causing confusion. Courts analyze whether an actual conflict exists or if both laws can coexist. If repugnancy is found, the union law or the latter law with presidential assent supersedes. This ensures legislative harmony and respects the Constitution’s hierarchy. States, though free to adapt central frameworks for local conditions, must avoid direct contradiction. Mastery of this principle explains how India’s concurrency fosters unity without stifling state innovation.

Practice Questions

संघीय ढांचे में केंद्र और राज्य सरकारों के बीच शक्ति का विभाजन किस सिद्धांत पर आधारित है?

View Question

Who among the following was the first woman Speaker of the Lok Sabha?

View Question

Who was the first woman Prime Minister of India?

View Question

In India, the power to declare war and peace is vested in which of the following?

View Question

किस संविधान संशोधन ने राष्ट्रपति के चुनाव में एकल मत प्रणाली अपनाने का प्रावधान किया?

View Question

What is the term of office for a Governor of a state in India?

View Question

Which amendment of the Indian Constitution gave the Right to Education a fundamental right?

View Question

संसद द्वारा विधेयक का पुनर्विचार किस अनुच्छेद के अंतर्गत संभव है?

View Question

Which of the following is NOT a feature of the Indian Constitution?

View Question

Which of the following is NOT a Fundamental Right under the Indian Constitution?

View Question