Topic Details (Notes format)

Judicial Activism

Subject: Polity

Book: Indian Polity by M. Laxmikanth

Characterized by proactive judgments where courts step in to fill legislative or executive voids. Often exercised through Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that broadens access to justice for marginalized communities. Critics argue that excessive activism blurs the separation of powers. However, advocates see it as necessary when governance fails, citing cases like Vishakha (1997) on workplace harassment guidelines and environment protection mandates. Judicial activism can reshape socio-political landscapes, as judges interpret fundamental rights in progressive ways. Balancing activism and judicial restraint remains a constant debate, hinging on whether courts are overreaching or rightfully safeguarding constitutional morality.

Practice Questions

Who has the authority to dissolve the Lok Sabha?

संसद में मतभेद सुलझाने के लिए किस व्यवस्था का प्रयोग होता है?

Which of the following is NOT a part of the Indian Constitution?

न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति में किस समिति की सिफारिश ली जाती है?

Which is the largest state in India by area?

कार्यपालिका और विधानपालिका के बीच संतुलन किस सिद्धांत पर आधारित है?

Which article of the Indian Constitution provides for the amendment process?

राज्यों के बीच मतभेदों का समाधान किस प्रावधान के तहत किया जाता है?

Which of the following is a provision of the Indian Constitution regarding the Emergency?

Who is the guardian of the Indian Constitution?