Topic Details (Notes format)

Judicial Restraint vs. Judicial Activism

Subject: Polity

Book: Indian Polity by M. Laxmikanth

Debates the extent courts should intervene in policy. Judicial restraint advocates minimal interference, respecting the legislature’s and executive’s domain. Judicial activism supports proactive stances to fill legislative gaps or protect rights. While activism has led to progressive decisions on environmental issues, women’s rights, and corruption, excessive activism risks overshadowing elected bodies. Restraint ensures stability and democratic respect. Balancing both is key—courts must uphold constitutional principles yet avoid legislative or policy-making roles. Understanding this spectrum helps contextualize judgments that shape the interplay of law, politics, and social reforms in India’s constitutional democracy.

Practice Questions

भारत का राष्ट्रपति किस प्रक्रिया द्वारा चुना जाता है?

View Question

Who has the authority to remove the Vice President of India from office?

View Question

In India, the power to declare war and peace is vested in which of the following?

View Question

Who among the following is the ex-officio Chairman of the National Human Rights Commission of India?

View Question

Which of the following is an essential feature of a federal system?

View Question

उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन किस आधार पर किया जाता है?

View Question

Who is the ex-officio Chairman of the National Human Rights Commission of India?

View Question

आपातकाल की घोषणा के लिए प्रत्येक सदन में कितने प्रतिशत मतों की आवश्यकता होती है?

View Question

भारतीय संविधान में नागरिकों के मौलिक अधिकार किस दस्तावेज़ में वर्णित हैं?

View Question

किस संविधान संशोधन ने राष्ट्रपति के चुनाव में एकल मत प्रणाली अपनाने का प्रावधान किया?

View Question