Topic Details (Notes format)

Judicial Restraint vs. Judicial Activism

Subject: Polity

Book: Indian Polity by M. Laxmikanth

Debates the extent courts should intervene in policy. Judicial restraint advocates minimal interference, respecting the legislature’s and executive’s domain. Judicial activism supports proactive stances to fill legislative gaps or protect rights. While activism has led to progressive decisions on environmental issues, women’s rights, and corruption, excessive activism risks overshadowing elected bodies. Restraint ensures stability and democratic respect. Balancing both is key—courts must uphold constitutional principles yet avoid legislative or policy-making roles. Understanding this spectrum helps contextualize judgments that shape the interplay of law, politics, and social reforms in India’s constitutional democracy.

Practice Questions

राजनीतिक दलों की स्वतंत्रता किस अनुच्छेद में सुनिश्चित की गई है?

View Question

भारतीय संविधान में मौलिक कर्तव्यों का प्रावधान किस अनुच्छेद में है?

View Question

What is the minimum age for a person to contest elections for the Lok Sabha?

View Question

What is the minimum age required to become the President of India?

View Question

What is the role of the Election Commission of India?

View Question

वरिष्ठ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति में किस समिति का योगदान होता है?

View Question

Who has the authority to dissolve the Rajya Sabha?

View Question

न्यायिक समीक्षा मुख्यतः किन के खिलाफ की जाती है?

View Question

संविधान सभा के सदस्यों का चुनाव किस प्रकार से हुआ था?

View Question

What is the procedure for impeachment of the President of India?

View Question